![]() But here is the next issue: What does the MusicXML file define that text as on the way out? usually end up in the right area on the page. But you may discover that, on closer inspection ( attachment lines help with this), the reading of the scan may have that forte attached above the third system. If you look at a page and see a forte marking below the second staff system, to your eye it’s applied to the note in that system. Much like a relationship gone awry, text also has “attachment issues”. Lyrics are most often successfully read correctly (although if I had a nickel for every ‘m’ that came out as ‘rn’…). That this can be done with any success at all is amazing. If there is an ‘A’ above the staff, is it a rehearsal mark, a chord symbol, a lyric from the staff above, ‘A tempo’ or something else? For instance, one of my favorite misfires (and this happened in several of the apps) is that the marcato symbol is often misinterpreted as an ‘A.’ Original source material The same material, as interpreted by OMR software The issue with text on a page is, ‘what type of text is it?’: page text, staff text, system text, lyrics, chord symbols, dynamics, etc. ![]() Generally, all of these apps read notes and rests on a scale of OK to excellent. To see those source materials for yourself, you can download them here. The first page of “NCL Celebrates-Rock”, one of the source tests
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |